🔗 Share this article

Do your LinkedIn followers recognizing you as a thought leader? Are hordes of commenters praising your insights on growing your venture? Do recruiters reaching out to discuss collaborations?

Should that not be the case, the reason might be your gender.

The Experiment: Modifying Gender Identity for Better Visibility

Dozens of female professionals participated in an organized professional network test this week following popular discussions indicated that changing their gender to "male" boosted their network presence.

Other testers modified their profiles to incorporate what they called "masculine-oriented" terminology - inserting results-driven professional jargon like "drive", "revolutionize" and "expedite". Anecdotally, their visibility also improved.

Systemic Preference Questions Raised

The engagement increase has led some to speculate whether a built-in sexism in the platform's system favors male users who use online business jargon.

Like most major networking sites, LinkedIn employs an algorithm to determine which content appear to which members - promoting some while suppressing others.

Company Statement

Through a blog post, LinkedIn recognized the trend but stated it does not factor in "demographic information" when deciding post visibility. Instead, the company explained that "hundreds of signals" affect how content are received.

Changing gender in your settings does not affect how your posts shows up in search or feed.

Individual Results

A social media consultant, who changed her pronouns to "male pronouns" and her name to "Simon E", reported remarkable outcomes.

"The statistics I'm observing show a sixteen-fold rise in visitor traffic and a thirteen-fold jump in impressions," she commented.

Another professional, a communications strategist, started testing after observing her reach decrease substantially.

The Method

• Initially, she changed her gender to "man"
• Then, she used AI tools to rephrase her professional summary using "masculine-oriented" wording
• Lastly, she repurposed old posts with comparable "agentic" language

The result was immediate: a more than fourfold rise in visibility within seven days.

The Downside

Despite the success, Cornish voiced unhappiness with the approach.

"Before, my content were softer - concise and insightful, but also friendly and human," she explained. "Now, the masculine version was forceful and confident - like a Caucasian man being overly confident."

She discontinued the test after seven days, stating "Each day I continued, and outcomes improved, I became more frustrated."

Varying Outcomes

Some testers encountered positive results. One writer who changed both her profile gender to "man" and her ethnicity to "Caucasian" reported a reduction in reach and engagement.

"We understand there's algorithmic bias, but it's very challenging to understand how it operates in specific cases or why," she remarked.

Broader Implications

These tests occur alongside continuing discussions about LinkedIn's distinctive role as both a business platform and community site.

Platform modifications in the past few months have apparently resulted in women professionals experiencing significantly reduced visibility, leading to unofficial tests where identical posts by male and female users received dramatically unequal audience engagement.

Technical Explanation

Per LinkedIn, the platform uses AI systems to classify and distribute content based on multiple factors, including what's shared and the member's career profile.

The company claims it regularly evaluates its algorithms, including "checks for inequalities based on gender."

A spokesperson suggested that recent declines in some users' reach might stem from higher volume due to additional posts on the network.

Evolving Environment

According to a tester observed, "masculine-oriented language" appears to be increasing on the network.

"Users typically consider LinkedIn as more professional and refined," she commented. "That's changing. It's becoming increasingly competitive and less controlled."